
01Redbridge, London
Mansard roof drawings in Redbridge
Redbridge's Housing Design SPD writes its roof rules around rear dormers, parapets and hip-to-gable work, and a mansard meets the parapet line first. We draw the roof against those tests and against the 16 conservation areas in the borough, from £845 including VAT.
From £845 (VAT included)
- MCIAT chartered architectural technologists
- £2m professional indemnity insurance
- LABC Partnered
- ICO registered
02The brief
What the Housing Design SPD says about roofs
The Housing Design Guide SPD sets the council's roof tests. Rear dormers are acceptable in principle but must stay subordinate: set down from the ridge, above the eaves line and in from the shared boundary and roof edge, with less set-in from the edge on hipped roofs. Its position on terrace parapets and front or side dormers is: no raised parapets; no front/side dormers.
On hip-to-gable the SPD's line reads: generally refused if out of character. Our data holds no mansard-specific test, so a mansard is read against these same character tests, and the parapet line is where it is most exposed.


03The record
Local figures for Redbridge
| Measure | Value | Period | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hip-to-gable generally refused where out of character or harming symmetry of a semi-detached pair | generally refused if out of character | No period | redbridge.gov.uk, Housing Design SPD (adopted September 2019), para 3.6.1 |
| Terrace parapet walls not to be built up; front and side dormers generally inappropriate unless characteristic of street | no raised parapets; no front/side dormers | No period | redbridge.gov.uk, Housing Design SPD (adopted September 2019), para 3.6.3 |
| Supplementary planning document | Housing Design Guide SPD | 2019 | redbridge.gov.uk |
| Conservation areas | 16 named conservation areas published by the council | No period | planning.data.gov.uk |
| Listed building entries | 134 list entries (Historic England, within the LPA boundary) | No period | planning.data.gov.uk |
| Householder decisions | 991 decisions | 1 July 2025 - 30 June 2026 | assets.publishing.service.gov.uk |
| Householder applications granted | 82.8 % | 1 July 2025 - 30 June 2026 | assets.publishing.service.gov.uk |
| Class AA, para AA.1(b) | Class AA is not available on article 2(3) land | No period | legislation.gov.uk |
| Householder: alterations/extensions to a single dwellinghouse, from 1 Apr 2026 | 548 GBP | No period | ribblevalley.gov.uk |
A blank value means the figure has not been published, not that there are none. Check your own address with the council.
- Barking and Dagenham
- Epping Forest
- Waltham Forest
- Newham
- Havering
04The streets
Householder applications by street in Redbridge
| Street | Applications | Approved |
|---|---|---|
| Wensleydale Avenue | 37 | 73% |
| Kings Avenue | 33 | 71% |
| Gyllyngdune Gardens | 32 | 39% |
| Malford Grove | 31 | 71% |
| Wanstead Park Avenue | 29 | 89% |
| Broadwalk | 27 | 91% |
| Falmouth Gardens | 27 | 88% |
| Levett Gardens | 27 | 58% |
| Beehive Lane | 25 | 48% |
| Goodmayes Lane | 24 | 71% |
| High View Road | 24 | 83% |
| Woodlands Avenue | 24 | 86% |
| Beattyville Gardens | 23 | 78% |
| Bressey Grove | 23 | 86% |
| Monkhams Avenue | 23 | 86% |
Counts of householder applications by street; no individual applications are shown. Streets with fewer than five applications are left out.
05The drawing
A mansard roof in section
A London terrace with a mansard behind the parapet. The lettered marks show the limits the legend gives.
- A Redbridge: set-back and parapet
- no raised parapets; no front/side dormers
- B Permitted development and the eaves
- Class B requires the original eaves to be maintained or reinstated, which a parapet-fronted mansard normally removes
- C Additional storeys under permitted development
- Class AA additional storeys exclude houses built before 1 Jul 1948 or after 28 Oct 2018
- D Fire protection to the stair
- New storey above 4.5 m by loft conversion: protect the full escape route with fire-resisting doors (min E 20) and partitions (min REI 30)
06The detail
Designations that change the route
Historic England records 134 list entries in the borough, 12 of them at Grade II*, and a roof change to a listed house needs consent as well as permission. The route is covered by listed building consent drawings in Redbridge.
Class AA is not available on article 2(3) land, and the Class AA date limits apply elsewhere: Class AA additional storeys exclude houses built before 1 Jul 1948 or after 28 Oct 2018. Redbridge also records an Article 4 direction on HMO conversions (C3 to C4), which governs use and not roofs.
Reading the householder record
Redbridge decided 991 householder applications in the latest return, and 82.8% were granted. Householder work covers every ordinary alteration, so the figure is background and says nothing definite about a roof storey.
Class B asks for the original eaves to be kept, and a parapet-fronted mansard normally removes them. That is why a mansard here is a householder application, with a council fee of £548.
What the drawings show
We draw the existing and proposed roof in plan, section and elevation on one datum, with set-downs and set-ins dimensioned against the SPD's tests. A new storey brings its own fire rule: New storey above 4.5 m by loft conversion: protect the full escape route with fire-resisting doors (min E 20) and partitions (min REI 30).
The new roof must meet the thermal limits for new elements in existing homes: New elements in existing dwellings, limiting U-values W/(m²·K): roof 0.15, wall 0.18, floor 0.18, windows 1.4 (or WER Band B), doors 1.4. Party structure notice at least 2 months before work, under the Party Wall etc. Act 1996.
Next door and below ground
A lower floor is covered in basement conversion drawings in Redbridge, and the neighbouring approach in mansard roof drawings in Newham. The general route is on the mansard roof drawings hub.

07The papers
What the drawings rest on
Loft conversions
08Correspondence
Questions
Can I build a dormer instead of a mansard in Redbridge?
A rear dormer is acceptable in principle under the SPD if it stays subordinate. We draw the set-down, the set-back from the eaves and the set-in from the boundary so the officer can check each against the guidance.
Does Redbridge allow raised parapets on terraces?
The SPD's short-form position is: no raised parapets; no front/side dormers. That bears directly on a parapet-fronted mansard, so we say early whether your terrace allows a different roof form.
How much do the drawings cost?
From £845 including VAT, fixed up front. The council fee is £548, paid separately.

82.8%
Householder applications granted, Redbridge, 1 July 2025 - 30 June 2026. Source: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
09Further reading
Related pages
10Sources
Sources and dates
- redbridge.gov.uk, retrieved
- redbridge.gov.uk, retrieved
- planning.data.gov.uk, retrieved
- planning.data.gov.uk, retrieved
- assets.publishing.service.gov.uk, retrieved
- legislation.gov.uk, retrieved
- ribblevalley.gov.uk, retrieved
- gov.uk, retrieved
- gov.uk, retrieved
- legislation.gov.uk, retrieved
Licences
- Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
- Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2026.
- Contains Historic England data © Historic England 2026. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2026.
- GLA Planning London Datahub, householder applications. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Send us the address of your house.
We look up the conservation area, listing and Article 4 position, then reply with a fixed fee. A message before 3pm is answered the same working day.