
01Sutton, London
Mansard roof drawings for Sutton houses
Sutton's extensions guidance leaves little room for a mansard on a house slope. It will not accept a mansard-type form on a pitched rear slope, and it resists dormers on front slopes where they are not part of the street. It does set out how a dormer should look, below the ridge and not across the whole slope. Our chartered architectural technologists (MCIAT) draw to those tests from £845 including VAT.
From £845 (VAT included)
- MCIAT chartered architectural technologists
- £2m professional indemnity insurance
- LABC Partnered
- ICO registered
02The brief
What the Design of Residential Extensions SPD says
The Design of Residential Extensions SPD gives the rear and front tests in separate paragraphs. At the rear, turning a conventional pitched slope into a mansard-type form is not acceptable. At the front, dormers are front dormers resisted where they are not characteristic, especially on terraces and semis.
For dormers the test is shape: below ridge; not full slope, away from the hip and behind the main elevation, with narrow cheeks. Hip-to-gable and half-hip changes are not encouraged, particularly where they upset the symmetry of a semi-detached pair.


03The record
Local figures for Sutton
| Measure | Value | Period | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Converting a conventional pitched rear slope into a mansard-type form is not acceptable | rear mansard not acceptable | No period | sutton.gov.uk, SPD4 Design of Residential Extensions (adopted October 2006), Appendix A, para A.5.7, p.24 |
| Front dormers resisted where not characteristic, particularly on terraces and semis | front dormers resisted | No period | sutton.gov.uk, SPD4 Design of Residential Extensions (adopted October 2006), para A.5.3, p.23 |
| Dormers set below ridge, away from hip, behind main elevation, not covering whole slope, with narrow cheeks | below ridge; not full slope | No period | sutton.gov.uk, SPD4 Design of Residential Extensions (adopted October 2006), para A.5.4, p.23 |
| Hip-to-gable or half-hip changes not encouraged, especially where they upset symmetry of a semi-detached pair | not encouraged | No period | sutton.gov.uk, SPD4 Design of Residential Extensions (adopted October 2006), para A.5.7 |
| Supplementary planning document | Design of Residential Extensions SPD | No period | sutton.gov.uk |
| Class B, condition B.2(b)(i)(aa) | Class B requires the original eaves to be maintained or reinstated, which a parapet-fronted mansard normally removes | No period | legislation.gov.uk |
| Class AA, para AA.1(c) | Class AA additional storeys exclude houses built before 1 Jul 1948 or after 28 Oct 2018 | No period | legislation.gov.uk |
| Householder: alterations/extensions to a single dwellinghouse, from 1 Apr 2026 | 548 GBP | No period | ribblevalley.gov.uk |
| Conservation areas | 8 named conservation areas published by the council | No period | planning.data.gov.uk |
| Listed building entries | 209 list entries (Historic England, within the LPA boundary) | No period | planning.data.gov.uk |
A blank value means the figure has not been published, not that there are none. Check your own address with the council.
- Croydon
- Merton
- Reigate and Banstead
- Epsom and Ewell
- Kingston upon Thames
04The streets
Householder applications by street in Sutton
| Street | Applications | Approved |
|---|---|---|
| Higher Drive | 35 | 70% |
| Oaks Avenue | 31 | 79% |
| Banstead Road South | 30 | 90% |
| The Gallop | 28 | 93% |
| Ridge Road | 26 | 80% |
| Foresters Drive | 23 | 91% |
| Pine Ridge | 23 | 85% |
| Pine Walk | 23 | 83% |
| Boundary Road | 22 | 76% |
| Caldbeck Avenue | 22 | 73% |
| Cornwall Road | 22 | 82% |
| Carshalton Park Road | 21 | 71% |
| Kingsmead Avenue | 21 | 90% |
| Alington Grove | 20 | 95% |
| Chiltern Road | 20 | 90% |
Counts of householder applications by street; no individual applications are shown. Streets with fewer than five applications are left out.
05The drawing
A mansard roof in section
A London terrace with a mansard behind the parapet. The lettered marks show the limits the legend gives.
- A Permitted development and the eaves
- Class B requires the original eaves to be maintained or reinstated, which a parapet-fronted mansard normally removes
- B Additional storeys under permitted development
- Class AA additional storeys exclude houses built before 1 Jul 1948 or after 28 Oct 2018
- C Fire protection to the stair
- New storey above 4.5 m by loft conversion: protect the full escape route with fire-resisting doors (min E 20) and partitions (min REI 30)
06The detail
What that means for a mansard brief
A conventional mansard replaces the whole slope, so at the rear it is the form the SPD names as unacceptable. The realistic route is a dormer drawn to the tests above, and we say so in the free constraints check, before you commission a survey.
Permitted development does not rescue it. Class B requires the original eaves to be maintained or reinstated, which a parapet-fronted mansard normally removes, and Class AA additional storeys exclude houses built before 1 Jul 1948 or after 28 Oct 2018.
Conservation areas, listed houses and the caseload
Sutton publishes 8 conservation areas, and Historic England records 209 list entries. A listed house needs consent for the roof as well as permission: see listed building consent drawings in Sutton.
Across 601 householder decisions the council granted 91.8%. That covers all household work, so read it as background to the borough, not as odds for a mansard.
The drawing set
Existing and proposed roof plans, sections and elevations, with the ridge, hip and neighbouring rooflines shown on one surveyed datum. The Party Wall etc. Act 1996 sets the timing for a party structure notice: Party structure notice at least 2 months before work.
Fixed fee from £845 including VAT, with the council's householder fee of £548 paid separately. A basement under the same house is a different application: see basement conversion drawings in Sutton.

07The papers
What the drawings rest on
Party wall services
08Correspondence
Questions
Can I have a mansard on the back of my Sutton house?
Not as a mansard. The SPD says a mansard-type form on the rear slope of a conventional pitched roof will not be acceptable. A dormer within its tests is the usual alternative, with the dormer below ridge; not full slope.
Does Sutton accept a hip-to-gable loft?
The SPD describes hip-to-gable and half-hip changes as not encouraged, especially where they upset the symmetry of a semi-detached pair. We check your pair and the street before drawing anything.
What do mansard roof drawings cost in Sutton?
Our fixed fee starts at £845 including VAT, and redraws are free until approval.

8
named conservation areas published by the council
Conservation areas, Sutton. Source: planning.data.gov.uk
09Further reading
Related pages
Other services in Sutton
Mansard roof drawings nearby
10Sources
Sources and dates
- sutton.gov.uk, retrieved
- sutton.gov.uk, retrieved
- legislation.gov.uk, retrieved
- ribblevalley.gov.uk, retrieved
- planning.data.gov.uk, retrieved
- planning.data.gov.uk, retrieved
- assets.publishing.service.gov.uk, retrieved
- legislation.gov.uk, retrieved
- gov.uk, retrieved
Licences
- Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
- Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2026.
- Contains Historic England data © Historic England 2026. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2026.
- GLA Planning London Datahub, householder applications. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Send us the address of your house.
We look up the conservation area, listing and Article 4 position, then reply with a fixed fee. A message before 3pm is answered the same working day.